| To: | msirota@isc.upenn.edu, autox@autox.team.net | 
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Rear Trunk Mat ? (was front swaybar) | 
| From: | TeamZ3@aol.com | 
| Date: | Wed, 23 Jun 1999 13:07:08 EDT | 
msirota@isc.upenn.edu writes: << Why should some vehicles get to > remove an item, and others not? Why should some vehicles get to have all-wheel drive, and others not? Why should some vehicles get to have anti-lock brakes, and ot >> I only posed the question as a lead-in to my next paragraph, which mirrored your sentiments exactly. M Sipe  | 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> | 
|---|---|---|
  | ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Mid-Atlantic Motorsport: New Address and #'s, TeamZ3 | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: miata touring to PEP package conversion, Charles Kelly | 
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Rear Trunk Mat ? (was front swaybar), Mark Sirota | 
| Next by Thread: | Re: Rear Trunk Mat ? (was front swaybar), Robert & Katherine Seamon | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |