| To: | <autox@autox.team.net> | 
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Revised STU Proposed Rules - Plan of attack | 
| From: | "Mapman at Work" <mapman1138@interaccess.com> | 
| Date: | Wed, 14 Jul 1999 10:36:13 -0500 | 
>I'm concerned that convertible versions of STU-eligible cars would/could be much >lighter (and with a roll bar just as stiff, or at least "stiff enough"). > I'm very new to the list (lurking for less than a week), and a rank amateur (in every sense of the expression) when it comes to driving, but I am pretty sure that convertible versions of sedans/coupes are almost universally (there are exceptions) heavier than the original car. Stiffening them would only add to this. Mike  | 
| Previous by Date: | Salute to Hazel, JD_Kemp | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Revised STU Proposed Rules - Plan of attack, Chan, Albert (GEP) | 
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Revised STU Proposed Rules - Plan of attack, Miller, Don | 
| Next by Thread: | RE: Revised STU Proposed Rules - Plan of attack, Chan, Albert (GEP) | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |