| To: | <autox@autox.team.net> | 
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Stock class rules was (Re: Sequential Stock Classes) | 
| From: | "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net> | 
| Date: | Fri, 7 Jul 2000 18:25:15 -0400 | 
GH wrote:
    >>If your car has the capability of more camber than the spec 
    >>allows, and your alignment bolts come loose during your runs, 
    >>how do you prove you were legal on course when you get to 
    >>impound?  
Boy is that true!  I had to adjust the rear cams on my Supra twice
at the Peru National Tour because they were out of alignment. Who
knows what camber I was running. Supras (and Toyotas in general
I guess) are notorious for the cams slipping.
Kent Rafferty
 | 
| Previous by Date: | Re: Stock class rules was (Re: Sequential Stock Classes), TeamZ3 | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Stock class rules was (Re: Sequential Stock Cl, Kent Rafferty | 
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Stock class rules was (Re: Sequential Stock Classes), TeamZ3 | 
| Next by Thread: | Re: Stock class rules was (Re: Sequential Stock Classes), JCGZ3 | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |