| To: | "Nathaniel J. Leon" <nielleon@hotmail.com>, nersolo@ner.org, | 
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: [evolution-disc.] Re: Potential new helmet rule would | 
| From: | Matt Murray <mattm@optonline.net> | 
| Date: | Thu, 18 Nov 2004 13:47:08 -0500 | 
Yes, I know. But, does M-T use the same QC metrics for O-rings as they do SRS propellant? <j/k> :^) Matt Murray At 12:02 PM 11/18/2004, Nathaniel J. Leon wrote: >>Matt Murray wrote as PS > >>Just remember, Morton-Thiokol supplies the propellant for most >>SRSs. You remember Morton-Thiokol, they built the booster rockets >>for the Shuttles. > >Matt > >-Morton-Thiokol does make the propellent, but the propellent is not what >caused the 1987 Challenger Disaster (Fiasco). > >It was an O-ring in an improperly design joint seal that was operated >outside of its know temperature limits. > >Niel Leon  | 
| Previous by Date: | Re: [evolution-disc.] Re: Potential new helmet rule would, Matt Murray | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [evolution-disc.] Re: Potential new helmet rule would, Eric Salem | 
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [evolution-disc.] Re: Potential new helmet rule would, Matt Murray | 
| Next by Thread: | RE: [evolution-disc.] Re: Potential new helmet rule would, Eric Salem | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |