fot
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Fluid Dampeners

To: John Lehman <JELehman@ix.netcom.com>, FOT@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: Fluid Dampeners
From: "R. KASTNER" <kaskas@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 06:46:26 -0800
--------------050953009EAC0CD34BE6A933
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

The 2 litre engine was the most reliable engine we ever had.  It was so
good and the crank very very strong as it had lots of overlap. (The TR-6
should be so lucky) The rods were the weak point of the GT-6 engine
after they put on the TR-6 cylinder head. The damper is probably a good
thought but torsionals in that engine were never a major worry. We
turned to 8000 and made over 180 bhp at 7700 on the standard (ho ho ho )
Stromberg carbs. Making the rotating mass lighter is almost ALWAYS a
good idea.

John Lehman wrote:

>  In trying to increase the reliablility of our GT6 engine, my partner
> came up with the idea of adding a fluid balancer to the front end of
> the crank to take some of the flex and vibration out of the crank.
> Has anybody done this? With what results?  We used a balancer from a
> 5.0-liter Ford motor and it seems to make the whole motor run
> smoother, but we haven't got all that much time on the motor to tell
> if reliability is improved.  This actually increases the rotating
> mass.  Would lightening the flywheel make any sense in combination
> with the fluid dampener? Any opinions, well-reasoned and insightful or
> not, are welcome. John Lehman



--------------050953009EAC0CD34BE6A933
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<HTML>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF">
The 2 litre engine was the most reliable engine we ever had.&nbsp; It was
so good and the crank very very strong as it had lots of overlap. (The
TR-6 should be so lucky) The rods were the weak point of the GT-6 engine
after they put on the TR-6 cylinder head. The damper is probably a good
thought but torsionals in that engine were never a major worry. We turned
to 8000 and made over 180 bhp at 7700 on the standard (ho ho ho ) Stromberg
carbs. Making the rotating mass lighter is almost ALWAYS a good idea.

<P>John Lehman wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>&nbsp;<FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE=-1>In trying
to increase the reliablility of our GT6 engine, my partner came up with
the idea of adding a fluid balancer to the front end of the crank to take
some of the flex and vibration out of the crank.&nbsp; Has anybody done
this? With what results?&nbsp; We used a balancer from a 5.0-liter Ford
motor and it seems to make the whole motor run smoother, but we haven't
got all that much time on the motor to tell if reliability is improved.&nbsp;
This actually increases the rotating mass.&nbsp; Would lightening the flywheel
make any sense in combination with the fluid dampener?</FONT></FONT>&nbsp;<FONT 
COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE=-1>Any
opinions, well-reasoned and insightful or not, are 
welcome.</FONT></FONT>&nbsp;<FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE=-1>John
Lehman</FONT></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE>
&nbsp;
</BODY>
</HTML>

--------------050953009EAC0CD34BE6A933--


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>