fot
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: bearing width

To: "mordy dunst/ gasket works" <gasket.works@verizon.net>,
Subject: Re: bearing width
From: "Jack W. Drews" <vinttr4@geneseo.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 17:51:58 -0500
I would not be nearly as interested in potential hp gain or ability to rev. 
What I'm interested in is making available to the Triumph community some 
high quality rods at a fraction of the cost of Carillos.

At 10:01 AM 8/26/2004, mordy dunst/ gasket works wrote:
>Granted, the TR tractor motor has a stout three main crank.. it's ability to
>tolorate what we through at it is really amazing.     But, the key here is
>three mains.  I am not convinced that decreasing the rod jo diam is a good
>thing.  It would seem that the advantage is reduced bearing speed but,
>disadvantage in increasing the unit bearing load?  So, if our cranks are
>made with smaller rod journals will this be a problem in three Main
>cranks? -especially with flex harmonics?.
>
>But, if the bottom end of the rod is narrowed the crank journal would either
>have to be welded up or spaced would this then distribute the load and
>mitigate against  this increased load?
>
>
>
>M. Dunst

uncle jack 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>