fot
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Fot] TR3 Weights

To: John Hasty <jhasty@mhc-law.com>
Subject: Re: [Fot] TR3 Weights
From: Duncan Charlton <duncan.charlton54@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 07:04:51 -0500
Cc: "fot@autox.team.net" <fot@autox.team.net>
Delivered-to: mharc@autox.team.net
Delivered-to: fot@autox.team.net
References: <001201d0f291$555cf700$0016e500$@ca> <66E6030A7B084BA586CBF1BED790241F@GebruikerPC> <E595E0F8-9A91-4941-AF94-23B5F8A1AB63@mhc-law.com>
What tire pressures are you using in each corner?  What are your tire temps 
when coming off the track?  Other items to consider early -- less air in the 
rear tires will reduce understeer as will an anti-roll bar in the rear.
Duncan
(Texas)

Sent from my iPhone

> On Sep 19, 2015, at 12:21 PM, John Hasty <jhasty@mhc-law.com> wrote:
> 
> Wow...and all this time I  just thought old, narrow tracked, front engined    
>  English cars naturally pushed (NASCAR term) in right corners!
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On Sep 19, 2015, at 11:21 AM, "Marcel Van Mulders" 
>> <van.mulders.marcel@telenet.be> wrote:
>> 
>> Barry,
>> The cross weight 2% off is a lot and should be avoided. It should be very
>> nearly to 50%  with the driver on board. So forget about the goal that the
>> left front wheel and the left rear wheel should have the same load.
>> About Schroedar's explanation : that is right when the car has very much
>> power (more power understeer out off a corner because of the faster
>> acceleration when the inner wheel has more load/less traction loss( better
>> load distribution on the driven wheels)). A simpler explanation with that
>> weight distribution for our less powered cars is the left front wheel being
>> more loaded than the right front wheel(when the car is at rest), hence more
>> understeer in a corner to the right than in a corner to the left. Maybe we
>> have to accept understeer in slow corners but it can be equal left and
>> right, when the cross weight is 50%, driver included.
>> Most circuits are clockwise, so most corners are to the right :  moving
>> weight to the right is always a good thing. Battery, fire exstinguisher and
>> fuel tank should be as far to the right as possible. I've moved the complete
>> body of my car(TR4A) an inch to the right in respect to the chassis :
>> without driver, the left weight is equal to the right now and the front to
>> rear is 50.2% whith 25 litres of fuel.
>> This is all only an opinion of course, without pretending that it is correct
>> or important!
>> Marcel
>> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
>> Van: Fot [mailto:fot-bounces@autox.team.net] Namens Barry Munson
>> Verzonden: zaterdag 19 september 2015 6:12
>> Aan: 'FOT'
>> Onderwerp: [Fot] TR3 Weights
>> 
>> Amici - With the recent string discussing weights and currently dealing with
>> a TR3 which understeers in hair pins and decreasing radius corners (right
>> turns being the worst) but is neutral and very controllable in high speed
>> corners, left or right, I took the opportunity at a recent event to explore
>> the weight distribution on the TR3 and using the data try to determine
>> whether I had a tire issue or there was something inherent with the weight
>> distribution that was contributing to the understeering problem.
>> First a bit of background. The car is a 1959 TR3A that I use as my daily
>> driver in the summer and it takes me a day to convert it to racing
>> configuration. The weights below are for the car in its racing configuration
>> but includes the battery in its stock position, heater, windshield wipers,
>> headlights and front and rear bumpers. The car has a complete TR6 front
>> suspension (2 deg. neg. camber, 3 deg. pos. castor, 1/32 toe-in), TR6 comp.
>> front coils and comp. rear leaf springs and a 7/8 anti-roll bar.
>> Static weight, ie no driver, but with 5 gals. of fuel is 2009 lbs.
>> 
>> LF - 564      RF - 518
>> LR - 462      LR - 465
>> 
>> Front wt. - 1082   53.9%
>> Rear wt. -  927    46.1%
>> Left wt.  -  1026   51.1%
>> Right wt. - 983     48.9%
>> Right Cross wt. - 980  48.8%
>> 
>> I include these weights more for information than anything else since the
>> more relevant weights are with the driver and all his equipment in the car.
>> 
>> With the driver and equipment the total weight was 2221 lbs.
>> 
>> LF - 638     RF - 515
>> LR - 547     RR - 521
>> 
>> Front - 1153   51.9%
>> Rear - 1068    48.1%
>> 
>> Left - 1185   53.4%
>> Right -1036   46.7%
>> 
>> Left Cross wt. -  1159   52.2%
>> Right Cross wt. - 1062  47.8%
>> 
>> So what does this mean and how do I interpret it especially considering the
>> understeering problem that I'm dealing with. Well that's not easy. I'll
>> include a couple of quotes to see if that clarifies the issue - or maybe
>> not......
>> 
>> From Per Schroedar, Grassroots Motorsport - " ....Left cross weight >50% the
>> car will likely understeer in a right hand turn because right rear tire
>> carries more load so the car drives off the right hand turn better. But in a
>> left turn the opposite occurs and the handling is worse. In almost all cases
>> the loss of corning performance in one direction is greater than the gain in
>> the other direction." Not sure that I completely understand this.....
>> 
>> From Dennis Grant, Autocross to Win, Farnorthracing.com -
>> 
>> "Adjusting corner weights is one of those things that is part of your
>> baseline setup, but finding any sort of agreement on just how to set corner
>> weights is next to impossible. It seems everybody has their own favourite
>> formula and magic sequence.
>> 
>> I'm no different.
>> 
>> My method takes as a given that your car is, being production based, almost
>> certainly left side and front end heavy, thanks to the packaging of the
>> driver (offset left) and the engine/transmission (offset front). There are,
>> of course, exceptions, but for the majority of us, the physical distribution
>> of weight inside the vehicle is asymmetrical - and so then will be the
>> corner weights.
>> 
>> No amount of twiddling spring perches or cranking down on load bolts can
>> compensate for 200+ lbs of driver offset 10 inches left of the vehicle
>> centreline. Unless there is a corresponding mass in very nearly the same
>> location (in plan view) the corner weights will be offset left.
>> 
>> So then, the question becomes how to best minimize the effects of the
>> asymmetric weight distribution. If we have to live with it, at least we can
>> reduce the effects and keep things reasonably balanced.
>> 
>> Unless you only have left turns to deal with, you don't want to talk about
>> "cross weight" or "wedge". Those can be helpful in setting up a car that has
>> purposeful lateral static weight distribution bias because all turns are in
>> the same direction, but we don't play that game. It doesn't help at all that
>> most electronic racing scales sold in North America are intended for the
>> roundy-round guys and so will happily show you cross weight like it was the
>> magic ticket - it isn't.
>> 
>> Instead, I like to set up a car so that it has equal left weight front and
>> rear; that is, the portion of the left side weight on the front wheels is
>> the same as the portion on the rear wheels, by percentage. If the car has
>> 52% front left weight, then it should have 52% rear left weight. Why? So
>> there's no diagonal bias and no static twisting moment. It seems to keep the
>> car more predictable."
>> 
>> OK, using Grant's thought process and his Corner Weight Calculator here's
>> what the TR3's corner weights would look like:
>> Take 23 lbs out of the left front and right rear and add 23 lbs to the right
>> front and left rear which would give you the following distribution -
>> 
>> Left Front - 615.2       Right Front - 537.8
>> Left Rear - 569.8        Right Rear - 498.2
>> 
>> Front Left - 53.34%
>> Rear Left - 53.37%
>> 
>> Left  - 1185   53.35%
>> Right - 1036  46.65%
>> 
>> Left Cross wt. -   113.0    50.11%
>> Right Cross wt. -  1108    49.89%
>> 
>> Hmmmmm need to think about this.........
>> 
>> Barry.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> fot@autox.team.net
>> 
>> http://www.fot-racing.com
>> 
>> Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
>> Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
>> Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
>> Unsubscribe/Manage:
>> http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/van.mulders.marcel@telenet.be
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> fot@autox.team.net
>> 
>> http://www.fot-racing.com
>> 
>> Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
>> Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
>> Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
>> Unsubscribe/Manage: 
>> http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/jhasty@mhc-law.com
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic mail transmission has been sent by a 
> law firm on a legal matter. It may contain information that is confidential, 
> privileged, proprietary, or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure. If you 
> are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not 
> authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message, any part 
> of it, or any attachments. If you have received this message in error, please 
> delete this message and any attachments from your system without reading the 
> content and notify the sender immediately of the inadvertent transmission. 
> There is no intent on the part of the sender to waive any privilege, 
> including the attorney-client privilege, that may attach to this 
> communication. Thank you for your cooperation. 11 U.S.C. 528(a)(4) NOTICE. We 
> are a debt relief agency. We help people file for bankruptcy relief under the 
> federal Bankruptcy Code.
> _______________________________________________
> fot@autox.team.net
> 
> http://www.fot-racing.com
> 
> Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
> Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
> Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
> Unsubscribe/Manage: 
> http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/duncan.charlton54@gmail.com
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
fot@autox.team.net

http://www.fot-racing.com

Archive: http://www.team.net/archive


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>