fot
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Fot] TR3 front end conversion to TR6 parts: Camber - moving the bal

To: "'Tony Drews'" <tony@tonydrews.com>, <fot@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: [Fot] TR3 front end conversion to TR6 parts: Camber - moving the ball joint inward
From: Jack Brooks <JIBrooks@Live.com>
Date: Sat, 21 May 2016 11:25:21 -0700
Delivered-to: mharc@autox.team.net
Delivered-to: fot@autox.team.net
References: <BLU436-SMTP1634FEABB7F92625079F103A84C0@phx.gbl> <20160521160839.2A0FFA0856@relay.mailchannels.net>
Thread-index: AQGhUlNzWc55EnuB1qO1olgSK7yHXgGCN3u6oBhki4A=
Tony,

Thanks for the heads up. 

Jack

-----Original Message-----
From: Tony Drews [mailto:tony@tonydrews.com] 
Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2016 9:09 AM
To: Jack Brooks <JIBrooks@Live.com>; fot@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: [Fot] TR3 front end conversion to TR6 parts: Camber - moving
the ball joint inward

That will work to adjust the camber - after a bit of adjustment the a-arm
will hit the wheel and you'll need to shorten the outer end though.

Regards, Tony

At 12:34 AM 5/21/2016, Jack Brooks wrote:
>Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
>         boundary="----=_NextPart_000_004A_01D1B2E7.BE06EF10"
>Content-Language: en-us
>
>I am hoping to upgrade the front suspension on my (street/AutoX) TR3 
>this summer by changing out the upper A-arm, vertical link and trunnion 
>to TR6 parts.  I will use "the" Jag ball joint and shim it as required.  
>Due to the complexity of shortening the upper A-arm or moving the inner 
>pivot point inward, I am considering welding an extension to the upper 
>A-Arm ball joint mounting tabs on the inside to mount the ball joint 
>further inward and produce a similar result to shortening the A-arm.  I 
>have not removed my TR3 A-Arms yet, but it appears there is room to 
>move the ball joint inward at least an inch in this way.  I know I 
>can't go as far as those of you who have shortened the upper arms, but 
>it seems like it could be a decent compromise.  I am concerned though, 
>as this seems too easy.  None of you guys have done it. Instead you 
>have shortening the upper arms which, from what I have read, is 
>challenging, as is moving the inner pivot point and retaining 
>substantial structure.
>
>So, the question is. . . . . . . Why is simply moving the ball joint 
>further inboard not a good solution?  What am I missing?
>
>Thanks in advance,
>
>Jack
>_______________________________________________
>fot@autox.team.net
>
>http://www.fot-racing.com
>
>Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
>Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
>Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
>Unsubscribe/Manage: 
>http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/tony@tonydrews.com



_______________________________________________
fot@autox.team.net

http://www.fot-racing.com

Archive: http://www.team.net/archive


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>