That would be nice to add to my copy to keep it updated for the next
generations to come.
Good idea, Mark
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Harper" <AH@jharper.demon.co.uk>
To: "Quinn, Patrick" <Patrick.Quinn@det.nsw.edu.au>
Cc: <RAHosmer@aol.com>; <david@bighealey.ltd.uk>; <healeys@autox.team.net>
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 3:20 AM
Subject: Re: Austin Healey BN3
> Pat
>
> Reference your comment about a two and a half page letter you sent to
> the publishers of the 'Austin-Healey 100 & 3000 by McLavin and Tipping'.
>
> Why not publish this letter on this email list then we will all have the
> accurate story.
>
> All the best
> >
> >The other one is BN3/4 that was found in the wilds of Ontario, Canada
> >around 15 years ago.
> >
> > while BN3/4 was by
> >far a more radical design exercise using sedan chassis sections, front
> >cross member etc etc. Both cars are fascinating to anyone interested in
> >Healey History and it's wonderful the BN3/4 (the car that isn't mine) is
> >under restoration.
> >
> >. When Austin-Healey 100
> >& 3000 by McLavin and Tipping was published I sent the publishers a 2
> >and a half page letter outlining the errors in the book and did not
> >receive a response.
> --
> John Harper
|