The tailgate can be lowered but not removed as the rules require a full
bed(includes tailgate)
Dan
-----Original Message-----
From: Beth Butters <bbutters@dmi.net>
To: kturk@ala.net <kturk@ala.net>; 'Daniel Warner' <dwarner@electrorent.com>
Cc: Land Speed <land-speed@autox.team.net>
Date: Wednesday, November 10, 1999 12:32 PM
Subject: RE: Modified Pickup rules
> Danial, could you tell me if you have to run the tail gate up in
modified pick up ?? Been thincking about the class and it would make a
difference as to which style of box I ran. Thanks L. Kvach Butters
>
>----------
>From: Daniel Warner[SMTP:dwarner@electrorent.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 1999 7:50 AM
>To: kturk@ala.net
>Cc: Land Speed
>Subject: Modified Pickup rules
>
>By-laws, minutes, tribal knowledge - access to these items probably would
>not help vis a vis rules. The best route if a rule concern exists is to
>contact the proper class committee. If you don't know the committee chair
>directly, contact through the current head tech guy as listed in the rule
>book is the way to go.
>
>Questions regards the way an event operates can be answered via a letter to
>the Board, via the SCTA-BNI office or through this forum.
>
>Dan
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Keith Turk <kturk@ala.net>
>To: Daniel Warner <dwarner@electrorent.com>; dferguso@ebmail.gdeb.com
><dferguso@ebmail.gdeb.com>
>Cc: Land Speed <land-speed@autox.team.net>
>Date: Wednesday, November 10, 1999 6:17 AM
>Subject: Re: Fw: spoilers
>
>
>>Dan.... As Chuck mentioned from the SCCA folks.. rule book.... we be Thin
>>
>>I love our rule book for it's simplicity... sure we can argue about
certain
>>Items... but the overall rules are great in their latitude....
>>
>>I do have a question about things that have been discussed in the past and
>>settled on that are not in the rule book... someone mentioned By-laws and
>>minutes or some other form of clarification about the rules.... Is there
>>more that I should be reading?
>>
>>Keith Turk.... (happy to get through tech... that first time)
>>
>>----------
>>> From: Daniel Warner <dwarner@electrorent.com>
>>> To: dferguso@ebmail.gdeb.com
>>> Cc: Land Speed <land-speed@autox.team.net>
>>> Subject: Re: Fw: spoilers
>>> Date: Wednesday, November 10, 1999 7:35 AM
>>>
>>> The definition in the rulebook for spoiler vrs. wings has been around
for
>>a
>>> long time. Page 38, item h, 2nd sentence refers to single aero surface.
>>> Generally a single surface device is air flow over the top, a spoiler
>>with
>>> air flow over the top and bottom is defined as a wing by the SCTA-BNI.
>>Some
>>> aero people may disagree in this area, however, to keep it simple this
is
>>> the way the SCTA sees it.
>>>
>>> On a production car with a spoiler/wing if the device is raised from
the
>>> body it is defined as a wing also.
>>>
>>> Dan
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: dferguso@ebmail.gdeb.com <dferguso@ebmail.gdeb.com>
>>> To: dwarner@electrorent.com <dwarner@electrorent.com>;
>>> Land-speed@autox.team.net <Land-speed@autox.team.net>
>>> Date: Tuesday, November 09, 1999 12:19 PM
>>> Subject: Re: Fw: spoilers
>>>
>>>
>>> >hi dan, thanks for the compliment, it was a hell of alot of work to
>>design
>>> >and build it. on the spoiler, should i take it that if i say why i
>>think
>>> >it fully meets the requirements of the 98 and 99 scta rules ( i fabbed
>>it
>>> >myself when the 98 rules were applicable) that the 2000 rules will be
>>> >deliberately modified to send this spoiler to the scrapyard ? wow- i
>>dont
>>> >know how to comment
>>> >
>>> >doug@black radon engineering
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>
>
>
|