land-speed
[Top] [All Lists]

Fw: rear suspention

To: <land-speed@autox.team.net>
Subject: Fw: rear suspention
From: "John Burk" <joyseydevil@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 22:01:37 -0400
From: "John Burk" <joyseydevil@comcast.net>
To: <Nt788@aol.com>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 7:29 PM
Subject: Re: rear suspention


> Hi Jack . A torque tube that swivels in front doesn't deal with unequal
tire
> loading . If both ends are fixed suspension isn't possible . If the front
> pivots on the right-left axis you have high roll stiffness (more over
steer/
> spin prone) . None of this applies to a  car with a torque tube and IRS .
In
> the 60's all my dragsters had torque tubes . Many benefits , no chassis
> twist , guaranteed drive line alignment , safety (my friend lost his leg
to
> his front engine top fueler driveshaft)    John
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <Nt788@aol.com>
> To: <albaugh_neil@ti.com>; <joyseydevil@comcast.net>;
> <land-speed@autox.team.net>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 12:41 PM
> Subject: Re: rear suspention
>
>
> > In a message dated 10/13/2003 1:48:58 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
> > albaugh_neil@ti.com writes:
> >
> > << A torque-tube driveshaft solves the problem, too.
> >
> >  Regards, Neil     Tucson, AZ
> >   >>
> > I agree with that! Isn't that all rear suspensions try to emulate? Jack





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>