Seems like a shame to have the rules read for the least common denominator
in the skill department. At some point isn't it up the tech guys to look at
something poorly built and just say NO.. That way someone that does have the
skill to do something correctly can and those that can not might learn the
correct approach?.. I mean if someone mounts a wing to produce lift instead
of downforce will it just go through or something that is begging to fall
off the car or maybe some 1/4-20 lumberyard motor mount bolts?? I don't see
where constructor skill even gets into the rule making process.
Dave
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-land-speed@autox.team.net
> [mailto:owner-land-speed@autox.team.net]On Behalf Of Dan Warner
> Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2003 12:54 PM
> To: land speed
> Subject: traction control - moveable aero
>
>
> Lets close the year with a hot topic - TC.
>
> One of the postions I took opposing rear wings on
> Modified Roadster was that while some may have a wing
> professional built too
> many of our guys would just go to the scrap heap beside the
> garage, pick up a
> piece of alum. plate and say ..."this is good enough!"
>
> Every one have a happy new year. Looking forward to safe and fast 2004,
>
> DW
|