Kind of like comparing Solidworks or Pro E to an etch-a-sketch..
Dave
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-land-speed@Autox.Team.Net
> [mailto:owner-land-speed@Autox.Team.Net]On Behalf Of 3liter
> Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 5:43 PM
> To: land-speed submit
> Subject: IC Theory Book
>
>
> Dave & Neil thanks for the book title.
>
>
>
> What is interesting is you both endorse MathCad which is a strong
> affirmation of the software. So my question is; since MathCad is fairly
> expensive and Excel essentially "free", since it is included in "most"
> (but not all) MS Office suites, why would MathCad be favored over Excel?
> I have never used MathCad and would be interested in a comparison. Excel
> has a fairly robust plotting capability. Although you have to crunch
> your formula to get "data-in-a-series", once you do that the Excel plots
> are very nice. Does MathCad have more flexibility (or is it easier) to
> do plotting? -Elon
|