land-speed
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Land-speed] Still Asking Motor Questions, lol..

To: Dave Dahlgren <dahlgren536@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: [Land-speed] Still Asking Motor Questions, lol..
From: Larry Mayfield <drmayf@mayfco.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 14:44:49 -0800
Good input!

Thanks,

mayf

On 3/12/2011 2:17 PM, Dave Dahlgren wrote:
> The engine you propose will ne very prone to detonation so basically a 
> ticking bomb. Bad idea. Squish is very important.
> dave
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Larry Mayfield" <drmayf@mayfco.com>
> To: <land-speed@autox.team.net>
> Sent: Saturday, March 12, 2011 1:19 PM
> Subject: [Land-speed] Still Asking Motor Questions, lol..
>
>
>> Not being known for motor building prowess, I rely on the list to 
>> help me along.  Of late, I have been thinking about the use of a 289 
>> Ford (what else?) crank in the Mexican cast block I will pick up in 
>> June. I would like to use the 302 Ford 5.090 rods rather than the 
>> hard to find 5.155 rod length of the old 289 series motors. And I 
>> want to consider the use the 302 version of pistons for the same 
>> reason as availability in race configurations. That puts the piston 
>> down hole by 0.065 inches, however. That would reduce the compression 
>> ratio quite a bit.  But, I normally use dished pistons with about a 
>> 13 cc dish anyway.  So if I use flat top pistors, I think I can 
>> maintain the basic compression ratio, but, the "squish" would go 
>> away. At least I think it would. I do run the turbo on the motor but 
>> What I would like to hear comments on doing this.  Is this something 
>> stupid or actually reasonable to do on a boosted motor?  Is it likely 
>> to run well or just so so?
>>
>> No, I don't want to deck the block or mill the heads or find pistons 
>> with a longer wrist pin compression height. I know I can do those 
>> things, so, the question is can I do it the way described above and 
>> have a good performer?
>>
>> So, you gotta ask..why? Well, I keep looking at the rule book about 
>> displacement verification using the pump.  If the as pumped 
>> displacement is within 3% of top or bottom of the engine displacement 
>> class size then according to the book, it must be torn down for 
>> direct measurement. That's really the last thing I want to do. So if 
>> I can keep the motor size for a D motor to 289 - 296 cid range I 
>> should always pass a pump check and never have a tear down on the 
>> salt.  Not that I am worried about it because I don't think me or the 
>> Sunbeam has the beans or aero to qualify or set a record but..just in 
>> case, lol. And maybe someone else will benefit from this question in 
>> some other situation.
>>
>> mayf
>> _______________________________________________
>> Land-speed@autox.team.net
>> Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
>> Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
>> Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
>> Unsubscribe/Manage: 
>> http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/land-speed/dahlgren536@comcast.net 
_______________________________________________
Land-speed@autox.team.net
Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Forums: http://www.team.net/forums

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>