mg-t
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Mg-t] SU Low Pressure Fuel Pump

To: "'Stuart Keen'" <simbafish@comcast.net>, "'MG'"
Subject: Re: [Mg-t] SU Low Pressure Fuel Pump
From: "Lew Palmer" <lpalmer@roundaboutmanor.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2011 08:59:24 -0600
Stu,

Originally, the SU pump used 11 brass rollers to center the diaphragm. Later
pumps used a variety 
Of methods including the 5 double nylon spacers and 4 interconnected nylon
spaces. The use of these is important to keep the diaphragm centered. Just
the six body screws won't be enough. I rebuild a lot of pumps and find that
the brass rollers are the best and will always throw away the nylon spacers
if I have enough brass ones to do the job.

The clear mylar layer on the diaphragm is there in case the diaphragm should
begin to leak. There are several different designs of diaphragms both with
and without the mylar layer. They will all function the same way so don't
worry about which you use.

Cheers,
Lew Palmer
-----Original Message-----
From: mg-t-bounces@autox.team.net [mailto:mg-t-bounces@autox.team.net] On
Behalf Of Stuart Keen
Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2011 7:29 PM
To: MG
Subject: [Mg-t] SU Low Pressure Fuel Pump

I was inspecting/adjust the two SU fuel pumps on my 1951 MG TD MKII. Both
function, but they are not built the same and I was wondering if this could
be a design change or a problem later on.

One pump does not have any armature guide rollers. The workshop manual calls
for 11 single rollers but in lieu of the single ones, my other pump has 5
double rollers, sort of looking like 3O-O2. Must be a design change. My
question, are rollers necessary/important? The six bolts that marry the
whole assembly together should align the diaphragm anyway . . . Or am I just
assuming too much?

I also noticed that that the diaphragm of the same pump did not have a
plastic sheet barrier between the rubber diaphragm and the fuel like the
other pump. Is this plastic necessary? What9s its purpose - to keep fuel
away from possible leaks to the electrical? Without the plastic, the rubber
diaphragm would be exposed to fuel. Perhaps the rubber would deteriorate?
However, the diaphragm looks brand new so perhaps it comes now without the
plastic. Anyone have any knowledge about this?

Is it possible that the lack of guide rollers and plastic barrier is a later
design change?

Stu Keen
1951 MG TD MKII
______________________________________________

Mg-t@autox.team.net
Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
Suggested annual donation  $11.47
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
Unsubscribe/Manage:
http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/mg-t/lpalmer@roundaboutmanor.com
______________________________________________

Mg-t@autox.team.net
Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
Suggested annual donation  $11.47
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Forums: http://www.team.net/forums

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>