mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

Horsepower Differences

To: "MG Mailing List" <mgs@Autox.Team.Net>
Subject: Horsepower Differences
From: "Nick Coleman" <coleman@sd.aonix.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 1998 08:36:43 -0700
A friend who owned MGs in the 60s and 70s gave me a copy of a 1974 Chilton's
MG manual (hardback cover--don't see that these days) and a Unisyn balance
meter for tuning carb air flow (interesting device).

But as a I was thumbing though the Chilton's, I came across the engine
comparison's of different years:

Year    Eng     Size    Carb Type       Horsepower      Torque  Bore&Stroke     
Compress        Oil
74      18V     1798    HIF4 (2)        63@5000 87@2500 3.160x3.500     8.0:1   
        50-80
73      18V     1798    HIF4 (2)        81@5000 97@2700 3.160x3.500     8.0:1   
        50-80
72      18V     1798    HIF4 (2)        92@5200 110@3000        3.160x3.500     
8.0:1           50-80
71      18GK    1798    HS (2)  92@5200 110@3000        3.160x3.500     8.8:1   
        50-80

Years 72-74 are the same engine and carbs, but the horsepower (lost 33%) and
torque (lost 21%) is quite a bit different.  All had smog pumps and none had
catalytic converters.  Year 72 changed the carb and lowered the compression
from 71, but didn't appear to make a performance difference.

Were the differences a function of how the car was tuned?  (emissions?)

Or, was there some other difference?

Nick
73B



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>