mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

Fwd: E-mail charges

To: mgs@autox.team.net
Subject: Fwd: E-mail charges
From: Robert Sexson <rsexson@excite.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2000 14:44:24 -0700 (PDT)
----- Original Message -----
>  From: EDS3233@aol.com
>  Message-ID: <8.aa13673.26ff7cf9@aol.com>
>  Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2000 11:51:21 EDT
>  Subject: Fwd: E-mail charges
>  To: Johns7010@aol.com, rsexson@excite.com
>  
>  I saw this coming a long time ago.
>  Message-Id: <00Sep22.081819edt.119152@gatekeeper.bop.gov>
>  Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2000 08:14:55 -0400
>  From: "Edward Sexson" <esexson@bop.gov>
>  To: <eds3233@aol.com>
>  Subject: Fwd: E-mail charges
>  
>  Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 12:25:29 -0400
>  From: "Angela Page" <adeskin@bop.gov>
>  To: <bpagemlm@prodigy.net>
>  Cc: "Edward Sexson" <esexson@bop.gov>,
>      "Judy Huggins" <jxhuggins@bop.gov>,
>      "Kathy Donaldson" <kdonaldson@bop.gov>,
>      "Olivia Osten" <oosten@bop.gov>
>  Subject: E-mail charges
>  
>  Subject:  Vote No on Bill 602P
>  
>  
>  ---------------------- Forwarded by Evalin McClain/ad/kcmo on 09/19/2000
>  01:49 PM ---------------------------
>  
>  
>  Diana Johnson - 513-1483
>  09/19/2000 01:43 PM
>  
>  To:   SOS Audio <sosaudio@swbell.net>, Dallas Dixon/co/kcmo@kcmo,
>        sha7779311@aol.com, lglewis1 <lglewis1@pdq.net>, Evalin
>        McClain/ad/kcmo@kcmo, mnosseir@tb-engr.com, len5star@home.com,
>        kthompson@aol.com, Terezpw@aol.com 
>  cc:
>  Subject:  Vote No on Bill 602P
>  
>   VOTE NO ON Bill 602P!!!!
>  > > >
>  > > > I guess the warnings were true. Federal Bill
>  > > > 602P 5-cents per E-mail Sent. It figures! No more free
>  > > > E-mail! We knew this was coming!! Bill 602P will
>  > > > permit the Federal Government to charge a 5-cent
>  > > > charge on every delivered E-mail.
>  > > >
>  > > > Please read the following carefully if you
>  > > > intend to stay online, and continue using E-mail. The
>  > > > last few months have revealed an alarming trend in
>  > > > the Government of the United States attempting to quietly
>  > > > push through legislation that will affect our use of
>  > > > the Internet.
>  > > >
>  > > > Under proposed legislation, the US Postal
>  > > > Service will be attempting to bill E-mail users out
>  > > > of "alternative postage fees." Bill 602P will permit the
>  > > > Federal Government to charge a 5-cent surcharge on
>  > > > every E-mail delivered, by billing Internet Service
>  > > > Providers at source. The consumer would then be
>  > > > billed in turn by the ISP.
>  > > >
>  > > > Washington DC lawyer Richard Stepp is
>  > > > working without pay to prevent this legislation from
>  > > > becoming law. The US Postal Service is claiming lost
>  > > > revenue, due to the proliferation of E-mail, is
>  > > > costing nearly $230,000,000 in revenue per year. You
>  > > > may have noticed their recent ad campaign: "There is
>  > > > nothing like a letter."
>  > > >
>  > > > Since the average person received about 10
>  > > > pieces of E-mail per day in 1998, the cost of the
>  > > > typical individual would be an additional 50 cents a
>  > > > day -- or over $180 per year -- above and beyond
>  > > > their regular Internet costs. Note that this would be money
>  > > > paid directly to the US Postal Service for a service
>  > > > they do not even provide. The whole point of the
>  > > > Internet is democracy and noninterference. You are
>  > > > already paying an exorbitant price for snail mail
>  > > > because of bureaucratic efficiency. It currently
>  > > > takes up to 6 days for a letter to be delivered from coast
>  > > > to coast. If the US Postal Service is allowed to
>  > > > tinker with E-mail, it will mark the end of the
>  > > > "free" Internet in the United States. Our congressional
>  > > > representative, Tony Schnell (R) has even suggested a
>  > > > "$20-$40 per month surcharge on all Internet service"
>  > > > above and beyond the governments proposed E-mail
>  > > > charges.
>  > > >
>  > > > Note that most of the major newspapers have
>  > > > ignored the story -- the only exception being the
>  > > > Washingtonian - which called the idea of E-mail
>  > > > surcharge "a useful concept who's time has come"
>  > > > (March 6th, 1999 Editorial).
>  > > >
>  > > > Do not sit by and watch your freedom erode
>  > > > away! Send this to E-mail to EVERYONE on your list,
>  > > > and tell all your friends and relatives write their
>  > > > congressional representative and say "NO" to Bill 602P.
>  > > > It will only take a few moments of your time
>  > > > and could very well be instrumental in killing a bill we
>  > > > do not want.
>  > > >
>  > > > Please forward!
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>





_______________________________________________________
Say Bye to Slow Internet!
http://www.home.com/xinbox/signup.html


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>