mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: E-mail charges - HOAX

To: buster_balz@operamail.com, mgs@autox.team.net, sec.glen@vif.com,
Subject: RE: E-mail charges - HOAX
From: "Gordon Rice" <gordonrice@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 19:18:38 GMT
This is a long running internet hoax that apparently will never
die. See http://www.wirednews.com/news/culture/0,1284,38418,00.html
for more information.


>From: Joe Short <buster_balz@operamail.com>
>Reply-To: Joe Short <buster_balz@operamail.com>
>To: <mgs@autox.team.net>, GLEN <sec.glen@vif.com>,   Larry Hoy 
><larryhoy@prodigy.net>, Robert Sexson <rsexson@excite.com>
>Subject: RE: E-mail charges
>Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 12:23:14 -0400
>
>So, someone actually thinks this is possible ?
>P.T. Barnum was right.
>
>Joe.
>
>
>
> >===== Original Message From GLEN <sec.glen@vif.com> =====
> >Hey! - Simple solution - move all your e-mail accounts up here to
> >Canada!  As slow as the Canadian Postes are, it will take about 40 years 
>to
> >pass the required legislation, even if it passed popular demand!
> >
> >Glen Eldridge
> >Beaconsfield, Quebec
> >
> >
> >At 08:59 AM 9/25/00 -0600, Larry Hoy wrote:
> >>If I see this one more time I think I'll vomit.
> >>
> >>Larry Hoy
> >>
> >> >-----Original Message-----
> >> >From: owner-mgs@autox.team.net [mailto:owner-mgs@autox.team.net]On
> >> >Behalf Of Robert Sexson
> >> >Sent: Sunday, September 24, 2000 3:44 PM
> >> >To: mgs@autox.team.net
> >> >Subject: Fwd: E-mail charges
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >----- Original Message -----
> >> >>  From: EDS3233@aol.com
> >> >>  Message-ID: <8.aa13673.26ff7cf9@aol.com>
> >> >>  Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2000 11:51:21 EDT
> >> >>  Subject: Fwd: E-mail charges
> >> >>  To: Johns7010@aol.com, rsexson@excite.com
> >> >>
> >> >>  I saw this coming a long time ago.
> >> >>  Message-Id: <00Sep22.081819edt.119152@gatekeeper.bop.gov>
> >> >>  Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2000 08:14:55 -0400
> >> >>  From: "Edward Sexson" <esexson@bop.gov>
> >> >>  To: <eds3233@aol.com>
> >> >>  Subject: Fwd: E-mail charges
> >> >>
> >> >>  Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 12:25:29 -0400
> >> >>  From: "Angela Page" <adeskin@bop.gov>
> >> >>  To: <bpagemlm@prodigy.net>
> >> >>  Cc: "Edward Sexson" <esexson@bop.gov>,
> >> >>      "Judy Huggins" <jxhuggins@bop.gov>,
> >> >>      "Kathy Donaldson" <kdonaldson@bop.gov>,
> >> >>      "Olivia Osten" <oosten@bop.gov>
> >> >>  Subject: E-mail charges
> >> >>
> >> >>  Subject:  Vote No on Bill 602P
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>  ---------------------- Forwarded by Evalin McClain/ad/kcmo on
>09/19/2000
> >> >>  01:49 PM ---------------------------
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>  Diana Johnson - 513-1483
> >> >>  09/19/2000 01:43 PM
> >> >>
> >> >>  To:   SOS Audio <sosaudio@swbell.net>, Dallas Dixon/co/kcmo@kcmo,
> >> >>        sha7779311@aol.com, lglewis1 <lglewis1@pdq.net>, Evalin
> >> >>        McClain/ad/kcmo@kcmo, mnosseir@tb-engr.com, 
>len5star@home.com,
> >> >>        kthompson@aol.com, Terezpw@aol.com
> >> >>  cc:
> >> >>  Subject:  Vote No on Bill 602P
> >> >>
> >> >>   VOTE NO ON Bill 602P!!!!
> >> >>  > > >
> >> >>  > > > I guess the warnings were true. Federal Bill
> >> >>  > > > 602P 5-cents per E-mail Sent. It figures! No more free
> >> >>  > > > E-mail! We knew this was coming!! Bill 602P will
> >> >>  > > > permit the Federal Government to charge a 5-cent
> >> >>  > > > charge on every delivered E-mail.
> >> >>  > > >
> >> >>  > > > Please read the following carefully if you
> >> >>  > > > intend to stay online, and continue using E-mail. The
> >> >>  > > > last few months have revealed an alarming trend in
> >> >>  > > > the Government of the United States attempting to quietly
> >> >>  > > > push through legislation that will affect our use of
> >> >>  > > > the Internet.
> >> >>  > > >
> >> >>  > > > Under proposed legislation, the US Postal
> >> >>  > > > Service will be attempting to bill E-mail users out
> >> >>  > > > of "alternative postage fees." Bill 602P will permit the
> >> >>  > > > Federal Government to charge a 5-cent surcharge on
> >> >>  > > > every E-mail delivered, by billing Internet Service
> >> >>  > > > Providers at source. The consumer would then be
> >> >>  > > > billed in turn by the ISP.
> >> >>  > > >
> >> >>  > > > Washington DC lawyer Richard Stepp is
> >> >>  > > > working without pay to prevent this legislation from
> >> >>  > > > becoming law. The US Postal Service is claiming lost
> >> >>  > > > revenue, due to the proliferation of E-mail, is
> >> >>  > > > costing nearly $230,000,000 in revenue per year. You
> >> >>  > > > may have noticed their recent ad campaign: "There is
> >> >>  > > > nothing like a letter."
> >> >>  > > >
> >> >>  > > > Since the average person received about 10
> >> >>  > > > pieces of E-mail per day in 1998, the cost of the
> >> >>  > > > typical individual would be an additional 50 cents a
> >> >>  > > > day -- or over $180 per year -- above and beyond
> >> >>  > > > their regular Internet costs. Note that this would be money
> >> >>  > > > paid directly to the US Postal Service for a service
> >> >>  > > > they do not even provide. The whole point of the
> >> >>  > > > Internet is democracy and noninterference. You are
> >> >>  > > > already paying an exorbitant price for snail mail
> >> >>  > > > because of bureaucratic efficiency. It currently
> >> >>  > > > takes up to 6 days for a letter to be delivered from coast
> >> >>  > > > to coast. If the US Postal Service is allowed to
> >> >>  > > > tinker with E-mail, it will mark the end of the
> >> >>  > > > "free" Internet in the United States. Our congressional
> >> >>  > > > representative, Tony Schnell (R) has even suggested a
> >> >>  > > > "$20-$40 per month surcharge on all Internet service"
> >> >>  > > > above and beyond the governments proposed E-mail
> >> >>  > > > charges.
> >> >>  > > >
> >> >>  > > > Note that most of the major newspapers have
> >> >>  > > > ignored the story -- the only exception being the
> >> >>  > > > Washingtonian - which called the idea of E-mail
> >> >>  > > > surcharge "a useful concept who's time has come"
> >> >>  > > > (March 6th, 1999 Editorial).
> >> >>  > > >
> >> >>  > > > Do not sit by and watch your freedom erode
> >> >>  > > > away! Send this to E-mail to EVERYONE on your list,
> >> >>  > > > and tell all your friends and relatives write their
> >> >>  > > > congressional representative and say "NO" to Bill 602P.
> >> >>  > > > It will only take a few moments of your time
> >> >>  > > > and could very well be instrumental in killing a bill we
> >> >>  > > > do not want.
> >> >>  > > >
> >> >>  > > > Please forward!
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >_______________________________________________________
> >> >Say Bye to Slow Internet!
> >> >http://www.home.com/xinbox/signup.html
> >> >
>

_________________________________________________________________________



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>