It's not related to the Chinese.
When they bought the car, they bought the rights to use the name MG
with that car.
So I don't get how they can build a new car and still call it MG.
On Jun 12, 2008, at 11:12 AM, Max Heim wrote:
> You wouldn't see that kind of performance from an electric car
> 3000+ lbs (before the battery pack). The only reason that the Tesla is
> capable of that kind of performance is that it is based on
> practically the
> lightest platform made, the Lotus Elise/Exige.
> As far as MG "still kicking", I am a little confused how this
> project is
> related to the 'new' Chinese MG company, and how it has the right to
> use the
> name. It seems to be a small private concern.
> Max Heim
> '66 MGB GHN3L76149
> If you're near Mountain View, CA,
> it's the primer red one with chrome wires
> On 6/12/08 5:03 AM, Martin C. Galan at firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
>> With the price of fossil fuel irreverently getting higher .... I'd
>> like to see
>> the electric version capable of 150mph and 0-60mph in five seconds.
>> Just happy MG is still kicking.
>> '65 MGB
> Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html
> You are subscribed as email@example.com
Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html