spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

Rough 1500 HP calculations

To: Larry and Sandi Miller <millerls@email.msn.com>
Subject: Rough 1500 HP calculations
From: Eric Mumford <mumford@rpi.edu>
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 1997 13:47:45 -0500
Cc: Spridgets <spridgets@Autox.Team.Net>
Organization: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
References: <0403c20241709c7UPIMSSMTPUSR01@email.msn.com>
Reply-to: Eric Mumford <mumford@rpi.edu>
Sender: owner-spridgets@Autox.Team.Net
For those of you who might be interested, I plugged some figures for the
1500 into Bruce Bowling's rough HP calculator just for kicks:

Dsplcmt/Bore    Comp            Engine RPM      HP
------------    ----            ----------      ----
1489.4 (std)    7.5 (std)       5250            65
"               9.0             "               78
1500 (.010")    7.5             "               66
"               9.0             "               79
1520 (.020")    7.5             "               66
"               9.0             "               80
1531 (.030")    7.5             "               67
"               9.0             "               80

Bruce is sure to warn the user that these are "extreme rough ballpark"
figures only, for power is certainly a product of more factors than RPM,
compression, and engine displacement.  I tweaked the engine RPM factor
to get 65hp out of the stock setup and then altered the other values as
I went down.

At any rate it gives some interesting values - it basically says that
you get nearly no power increase from boring out the cylinders on a 1500
block, at least compared with a simple switch to higher compression
pistons.

Thanks to Larry Miller for pointing out this page!!

e

--                                              ___   
 __.o,\____  *       Eric Mumford          *   ('v')  -> BA-KUK!
/__ \ /  _ ) *      mumford@rpi.edu        *  ((   ))
 (+)`---(+)  * http://travolta.stu.rpi.edu * --"---"--o

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Rough 1500 HP calculations, Eric Mumford <=