spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: sports vs sporty

To: spridgets@Autox.Team.Net
Subject: Re: sports vs sporty
From: john.kahoon@juno.com (John c Kahoon)
Date: Sun, 24 May 1998 20:14:43 -0400
References: <3.0.32.19980522100535.006b7098@sand.net>
Reply-to: john.kahoon@juno.com (John c Kahoon)
Sender: owner-spridgets@Autox.Team.Net

A Sports car has only 2 seats !


john.kahoon@juno.com
71 midget

>On Fri, 22 May 1998 10:27:20 -0700 Keith Wheeler <keithw@sand.net> 
>writes:
>>Chris Kotting wrote:
>>
>>>The Camaro/Firebird/Mustang don't qualify because by the time you 
>>make one 
>>>competitive, it's no longer a street vehicle.  (Unless you want to 
>>count 
>>>SCCA Solo II, which also has classes for Station Wagons and 
>>Minivans!)  ;^)
>>
>>The reason the two seater Mustang fastbacks were built because back
>>in the good old days when men were men (particularly if they wore
>>funny hats and drove silly little foriegn cars) the SCCA deemed that
>>the standard Mustang was not a "sports car" because it had a back 
>>seat.
>>
>>-Keith Wheeler
>>Team
Sanctuary                               http://www.teamsanctuary.com/
>>
>>
>>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: sports vs sporty, John c Kahoon <=