spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Warning, long ramble on shoddy

To: type79@ix.netcom.com, doddk@mossmotors.com
Subject: Re: Warning, long ramble on shoddy
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2000 21:06:43 EDT
Cc: british-cars@autox.team.net, spridgets@autox.team.net
In a message dated 06/29/2000 2:34:19 PM Pacific Daylight Time, 
type79@ix.netcom.com writes:

<< Maybe I'm naive, but isn't it the responsibility of the firm that orders 
the
 manufacture of the item, or decides to offer it for sale, to verify that it 
is
 correct for its application and in all aspects a suitable replacement for the
 original part?
 
 And if a supplier will not do that, why can't they simply state that a part 
is a
 repro?
 
 Jay Fishbein >>


errr Jay, that wouldn't be a repro...maybe a re tar do, or found art re sem 
blo...but not a repro...

RH...still at work after 11 hours and getting bitchy....

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>