spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Technical terminology-- probably not LBC contented

To: Ankitterer@aol.com, spridgets@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: Technical terminology-- probably not LBC contented
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 15:18:46 -0700
Annice -

Or as the caterpillar said, "who's the master? you or the word"

regards,

Clay L.
'67 Sprite

At 06:03 PM 9/18/2002 -0400, Ankitterer@aol.com wrote:
>In a message dated 9/18/02 7:33:23 AM, John.Deikis@med.va.gov writes:
>
><< Rings pretty true to me! >>
>
>No, No, No.  Methinks you have it wrong, but just enough to cause big trouble
>if anybody takes it as anything but a joke.  Most of those words are in my
>vocabulary, but that isn't what they necessarily mean.  There's just enough
>truth here to be really dangerous.  Besides, you are taking away a lot of
>perfectly good words from the feminine vocabulary and putting negative
>meanings to them--what words are we supposed to use now for fine, okay, and
>the like??
>
>Annice & Bob
>1960 Bugeye (Mk. IV in disguise) "The Sprite"
>1966 Sprite Mk. III (Still in Boxes) "Trevor"
>2000 Miata SE Mahogany "The Miata"
>2002 Jeep Grand Cherokee Laredo "The Heep"
>1991 Lazy Daze (Ford) "The Motorhome"

///  unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net  or try
///  http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
///  Archives at http://www.team.net/archive/spridgets


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>