spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Fwd: Re: Question for seller -- Item #1871209231] 29 Oct 2002 05:43

To: dbl@chicagolandmgclub.com (David Lieb)
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: Question for seller -- Item #1871209231] 29 Oct 2002 05:43:23 -0600
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 11:19:13 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: spridgets@autox.team.net (Spridget List), macy@bbl.med.upenn.edu (Larry B. Macy, Ph.D.)
David-

Well, I CAN argue, David, but what's the
point. I love these people who state, 
"It's Business" (or politics) as an excuse for obviously less than
honorabe ethics.
and behaviour. (But look at our role
models....Congress, Enron-like Big Business Ethics as in "fixing" the
stock
market and robbing millions of billions!
It just gets better and better, eh!! :)

Reminds me of certain types of people
"at war" who run into churches, transport
men and material in ambulances and hide
among innocent civilians or those who would excuse atrocities and the
most
dishonorable behaviour with the words
"holy war" in the name of God and "the
cause"! Anything goes! Remember
the Crusades!! Whoa, whoa!

In a nutshell, "character"..... usually put
there by other adults in one's formative
years. Not necessarily Mom and Dad. When it's good, it's good...when
it's
otherwise, it's otherwise!

In a personal sense.....
can it be changed? Yes. Experiences
from without can often serve as the
catalyst for critical introspection and
examination of the "self". You gotta
get "curious" about it I guess. Then
motivated to "clean up". 

A "near death experience" (especially
those of the "unanticpated" kind) can
work wonders, depending upon timing,
native intelligence and a "pure" motivation
to stop living one's life purposely at the 
expense of others to the extent humanly
possible in consideration of circumstances
when in your control.

I've been working on this since my very
early 30's. Matter of fact took two years
"off" in the initial "focused" effort to get
the show properly on the road and headed
firmly in the right direction!

This guy tried to screw Jay....it didn't
work. Now he's back-pedaling. This
won't work either. Better to "avoid" rather
than "argue", now that this "character" is
known. Getting "better" is the
seller's problem, Jay is already "well" and
I've got enough to do handling my imperfect "self" (but I'm workin' on
it! :)




Cap'n. Bob
    '60 :{)  

///  unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net  or try
///  http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
///  Archives at http://www.team.net/archive/spridgets


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [Fwd: Re: Question for seller -- Item #1871209231] 29 Oct 2002 05:43:23 -0600, Unknown <=