spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Bombers--The Lost Squadron--No LBC message of Mon, 2 Jun 2003 14:49:

To: JNBrashear@garverengineers.com (Brashear, Jack, N)
Subject: RE: Bombers--The Lost Squadron--No LBC message of Mon, 2 Jun 2003 14:49:43 -0500
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 09:07:14 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: macy@bbl.med.upenn.edu (Larry B. Macy, Ph.D.), DLancer7676@cs.com, spridgets@autox.team.net, Daniel1312@aol.com
".....while not designated as a bomber"

True, true, Jack. Most (if not all) WW2
fighters U.S.) fulfilled the dual role of "fighter/bomber" at one time
or cirumstance.

Matter of fact, Adolph went a little overboard on this and tried to have
his
boys produce the Me-262 as a "bomber",
rather than a "fighter"...delayed production
and thank God it did. About as bad a
decision as opening up a second front
and thank God, this operation got delayed
as well, 'cause otherwise.......??




Cap'n. Bob 
     '60 :{)

///  unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net  or try
///  http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
///  Archives at http://www.team.net/archive/spridgets


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • RE: Bombers--The Lost Squadron--No LBC message of Mon, 2 Jun 2003 14:49:43 -0500, Unknown <=