| To: | "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>, "Spridget List" <spridgets@Autox.Team.Net> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Re: Bugeye at BJ/302 |
| Date: | Thu, 27 Jan 2005 10:57:40 -0600 with any abuse report |
| References: | <aa0f597378ca4750889c2df39415cac1.toyman@digitex.net> <003b01c50487$a37495f0$0ef3bec0@NilesAD.von.gov> <6.2.0.14.0.20050127110426.0267fea0@mail.comcast.net> <000a01c50490$70f73ca0$0ef3bec0@NilesAD.von.gov> <003701c50490$d22a33b0$0300000a@Keith> |
Keith, You are arguing on my side, that was a 302, not a 305. The bore/stroke geometry is totally different as you are very aware. The shorter stroke of the 302 makes for better revving and longer life vs the 305. David Lieb 1972 RWA Midget |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Re: Bugeye at Barrett-Jackson, Unknown |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: alternator upgrade., Unknown |
| Previous by Thread: | Bugeye at Barrett-Jackson, Unknown |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Re: Bugeye at BJ/302, Unknown |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |