spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

Re[2]: Chichak elec dizzy +vacuum advance stuff

To: spridgets <spridgets@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re[2]: Chichak elec dizzy +vacuum advance stuff
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 09:21:01 -0800
References: <20051120163243.E82F9D64B@smtpout-3202.bay.webtv.net>
Hello,

       speaking of vacuum advance...........

       the original metal tube that runs from the front carb to the
       dizzy is gone from my engine. im using a piece of rubber hose
       that is a tight fit at each end, BUT...... i did lay my hands
       on one of the original tubes. i notice that is is much smaller
       diameter than the rubber hose. .... now the question(s)... how
       much difference in vacuum from having roughly twice the volume
       of air in the tubing as the original? ... i'm thinking it would
       just be a time lag? ... should the tubing be as short as
       possible to avoid this? or can i route the hose
       cosmetically?..... would i be better off using a section of the
       original and rubber hose for the end connections? .. is the
       difference (if there is any) strictly theoretical or applicable
       in high performance applications only? that is, would it make a
       SIGNIFICANT difference on the street on a relatively stock
       engine?

       TIA




-- 
Best regards,
 Bill                            mailto:pythias@pacifier.com
   "66 Sprite




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>