1) Geez, your derfness, read it again, I did cite your provisos. In fact,
that is exactly the subject of my post.
2) How is it off-topic when responding directly to your post?
3) Everything I said was factual about your post, but, then, I wasn't
pushing a position without stating facts.
4) By the way, you might notice that I didn't dispute anything you said.
LAD
----- Original Message -----
From: "derf" <derf247@gmail.com>
To: "spridgets list" <spridgets@autox.team.net>; "GUY DAY"
<grday@btinternet.com>
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 5:14 PM
Subject: [Spridgets] Fwd: Gun Laws in England
Or, a guy can omit the provisos and make off topic stabs at other
people without citing any facts himself.
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Larry Daniels <ladaniels@sbcglobal.net>
wrote:
> Guy, that's the problem with the internet and email. A guy can get on an
> email list and make all kinds of statements regarding an issue without a
> single fact to back it up. He can say something and then qualify it with
"I
> think" and then say another thing and say "I believe". Then he invites
> the
> reader to "check the crime rates there". I guess citing facts isn't
> required in oral diarrhea.
>
> LAD
_______________________________________________
Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html
http://www.team.net/archive
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/spridgets
|