Re: [Spridgets] whose fault is that!

To:	Kathryn Bales <kgb@frontiernet.net>
Subject:	Re: [Spridgets] whose fault is that!
From:	Hal Faulkner <frog.aye@gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 23 Jun 2010 17:23:11 -0700

What's the big deal?  I mean it was only 5 or 5.5.  Round here nothing under
6.0 makes the first section of the paper....
Hal
_______________________________________________

Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
Suggested annual donation  $12.75
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Forums: http://www.team.net/forums

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [Spridgets] whose fault is that!, Tim Collins Re: [Spridgets] whose fault is that!, David Lieb Re: [Spridgets] whose Fault is that!, corvallis Re: [Spridgets] whose Fault is that!, David Lieb Re: [Spridgets] whose fault is that!, brian S Re: [Spridgets] whose fault is that!, robertduquette Re: [Spridgets] whose fault is that!, robertduquette Re: [Spridgets] whose Fault is that!, Brad Fornal Re: [Spridgets] whose fault is that!, Jim Johnson Re: [Spridgets] whose fault is that!, Kathryn Bales Re: [Spridgets] whose fault is that!, Hal Faulkner <= Re: [Spridgets] whose Fault is that!, robertduquette Re: [Spridgets] whose fault is that!, robertduquette Re: [Spridgets] whose fault is that!, robertduquette Re: [Spridgets] whose Fault is that!, Brad Fornal Re: [Spridgets] whose Fault is that!, robertduquette Re: [Spridgets] whose fault is that!, Hal Faulkner

Previous by Date:	Re: [Spridgets] whose fault is that!, Kathryn Bales
Next by Date:	[Spridgets] Fwd: [spridgets] Bugeye Turn Signal Lens Rubber Body, Steven Guterman
Previous by Thread:	Re: [Spridgets] whose fault is that!, Kathryn Bales
Next by Thread:	Re: [Spridgets] whose Fault is that!, robertduquette
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]