| To: | "'tigers@autox.team.net'" <tigers@Autox.Team.Net>, |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: 260 Vs. 289 |
| From: | "Lloyd,Norm [Cal]" <Norm.Lloyd@ec.gc.ca> |
| Date: | Thu, 30 Jan 1997 21:31:30 -0700 |
ENOUGH ALREADY! >---------- >From: deldredge@acl.nyit.edu[SMTP:deldredge@acl.nyit.edu] >Sent: Thursday, January 30, 1997 8:56 AM >To: tigers@autox.team.net >Subject: 260 Vs. 289 > > > > I have recently acquired what I believe to be a 1967 Tiger with >the VIN 382001816. I have been told that it has a 289, not a 260. >Is this accurate. The Tiger does have the small Chrysler emblem on front >right and says Sunbeam V-8 on the back. Thanks. > > Deldredge@acl.nyit.edu > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: Float Valve Stickies, Ed E. Powell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Re[2]: Float Valve Stickies, Spook37211 |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 260 Vs. 289, Steve Wickland x3128 |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 260 Vs. 289, Paul Burr |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |