| To: | TigerCoupe@aol.com, dbinkley@argotech.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 289 vs. 302 |
| From: | RSpontelli@aol.com |
| Date: | Sat, 26 Sep 1998 00:03:43 EDT |
In a message dated 98-09-25 19:35:19 EDT, TigerCoupe@aol.com writes: << >From my point of view, there isn't a nickel's worth of difference between them, or a 260 for that matter. They all fit and look the same. Period. Look. >> And let's not foget the legendary 221. I have one of those in one of the sheds out back, and it fits.the.same.period.look too . . . Ramon |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Cooling and new cars, CoolVT |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Water as a coolant - Who is lying?, Steve Laifman |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 289 vs. 302, MWood24020 |
| Next by Thread: | GT for Sale, A. C. Tynes |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |