tigers
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Starters

To: Cullen.Bennett@motorola.com, tigers@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: Starters
From: Roland Dudley <cobra@cdc.hp.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 1999 08:20:08 -0800 (PST)
If I understand this correctly, 5-bolt 289 flywheels and 6-bolt 289
flywheels have different numbers of teeth?  Since I have both types of
motors (and starters, if the two are different) stored in my garage, I
want to make sure I have this straight so I don't install an incorrect
starter on my 5-bolt.

Roland

>Date: Thu, 9 Dec 1999 10:59:09 -0700 
>From: Bennett Cullen-P21988 <Cullen.Bennett@motorola.com>
>Subject: Re: Starters
>
>To  TYm McDowell and listees,
>One thing to be concerned with, especially when changing engines, is the
>number of teeth on the flywheel ring gear when mating a starter to it
>(as well as the built-in flywheel balance weights).  When I rebuilt my
>engine I was having a new ring gear installed onto the flywheel (the old
>one was all chewed up).  The previous owner had swapped a 5 bolt 289 for
>the 260.  The shop called me and said it had an "odd" number of teeth on
>the flywheel for a 289.  Apparently Ford used different numbers of teeth
>for different engines.  A mismatch will cause the teeth to be eaten off
>rapidly, and you cannot visually look at the starter drive gear and know
>which number of teeth it is supposed to mesh.  Maybe someone on the list
>can clarify (by the numbers) which goes with what?

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: Starters, Bennett Cullen-P21988
    • Re: Starters, Roland Dudley <=