tigers
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Dale's Front Antiroll

To: veeseeoso@aol.com
Subject: Re: Dale's Front Antiroll
From: Theo Smit <tsmit@shaw.ca>
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2002 14:15:27 -0700
That depends on what you mean by "proper". What's going to happen is the shocks
will actually be required to do the damping they're designed to do, instead of
having all the friction in the control arm bushings do it. You're going to get a
lot better drivability by reducing the friction in the suspension bearings,
simply because it doesn't take nearly as large a whack to get the control arms
moving. You might find that you can go up significantly in spring rate and still
get a reasonable ride, plus a lot less body roll, but at least now you'll be 
able
to make small changes and see a measurable improvement, instead of just having
the change be overwhelmed by the suspension friction.

Theo

Veeseeoso@aol.com wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> Does anyone have images of Dale Akuszewski performance front antiroll bar
> setup for the Tiger? This setup places the bar's fulcrums directly on the
> front suspension cross member (rather than on the lower control arms with the
> factory setup) which frees up a lot suspension bind. If one decreases bind,
> wouldn't more front spring be necessary for proper handling and drivability?
>
> Respectfully,
> Henry Vicioso

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>