i thought 260 and 289 rods were the same with the exception of the 289 hipo?
pretty sure they are interchangeable but perhaps the 289 ones were better...
others will no doubt chime in with better info but i don't think it would be
top of my list. are you planning on racing it too?
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Athena Scott
<ascott@globalplastics.co.zw>wrote:
> I bought a Tiger with a 260 motor. It could have been raced, and I am told
> the con rods on the 260 are weak and I should change to 289 con rods. This
> may have happened already. Can anybody tell me how I can distinguish
> between the 260 con rod numbers as opposed to the 289 con rods?
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Derek Scott
>
> B9480008
> _______________________________________________
> Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html
>
> You are subscribed as owain.lloyd@gmail.com
>
> Tigers@autox.team.net
> http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/tigers
>
> http://www.team.net/archive
_______________________________________________
Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html
Tigers@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/tigers
http://www.team.net/archive
|