tigers
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Tigers] Small-Block Intake Manifold Survey

To: <tigers@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: [Tigers] Small-Block Intake Manifold Survey
From: "Thomas Witt" <atwittsend@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 13:13:05 -0700
Interesting..., I put the garden variety Performer side by side with the 
often sought after F4B.  I also threw in the Stock intake as a comparison to 
the winner in each of the RPM ranges.  Hopefully the format will display 
correctly with the plain text requirement. Based on this test:

Performer vs F4B (and Stock intake comparison)

RPM         HP difference (gain)   Stock (over/under PFR vs F4B)
2750         F4B  1.9                    + 3.1
3000         PFR  4.0                    + 4
3250         PFR  0.4                    + 1.9
3500         F4B  2.8                     -6.7
3750         F4B  0.5                     -8.2
4000         F4B  4.4                     -11
4250         F4B  1.7                     -13.9
4500         PRF  4.2                     -18.6
4750         F4B  4.1                     -23.8
5000         F4B  9.2                     -19
5250         F4B  30.7                   -21.5

The stock manifold was best up to 3250 RPM.

The Performer and the F4B see-saw back and forth.  Up to 4750 RPM there is 
no more than a 4.4 HP difference.

 The Performers greatest benefits seem to be at 3000 and 4500 RPM.

The F4Bs greatest benefit is above 4750 RPM with a noticeable 30.7 HP gain 
at 5250 RPM.

An interesting final note is that the F4B never hit the maximum HP the 
Performer did (233.7 at 4500 RPM). The F4B topped out at 231 HP at 4750 RPM.

Conclusion (based on these test):

 The Performer or F4B are an improvement on the stock intake from 3250 and 
up RPMs.

The difference between the Performer and F4B are only about 4 HP up to 4750 
RPM.

The Performer actually beat the F4B in total HP by a small amount (2.7 HP) 
and at a lower RPM.

The F4B was the clear winner above 4750 RPM offering as much as a 30.7 HP 
gain at 5500 RPM. Note, while I use the term "gain" it is more like 
"sustain" in that the HP did not drop off as much.

Tom













----- Original Message ----- 
From: <wsamouce@kc.rr.com>
To: <tigers@autox.team.net>
Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 11:38 AM
Subject: [Tigers] Small-Block Intake Manifold Survey


> Not sure if this is a repost or not.
>
> Great artical from 1988 on comparing 10 intake manifolds to include the 
> "Cobra/F4B" and the "Tiger/low rise".
>
> I am happy to say that I have a Weiand 7515 on my 260 and it makes the 
> most power.
>
>
> 
>http://web.archive.org/web/20080415204031/http://www.jason.fletcher.net/tech/intakes/intakes.htm
>
> Duke
> B382002037
> _______________________________________________
> Tigers@autox.team.net
> Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
> Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
> Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
> Unsubscribe/Manage: 
> http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/atwittsend@verizon.net
>


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.437 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2838 - Release Date: 04/27/10 
06:27:00
_______________________________________________
Tigers@autox.team.net
Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Forums: http://www.team.net/forums

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>