[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Tigers] 4bbl Manifold

To: <tigers@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: [Tigers] 4bbl Manifold
From: "Thomas Witt" <atwittsend@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 20:54:26 -0700
Delivered-to: mharc@autox.team.net
Delivered-to: tigers@autox.team.net
References: <E1F77DE4-ADB5-44A9-B5D2-83986FE7C720@elams.org> <CAET8snVaY_it5zj_d+g0tGgH2n1dEiv3_dqVYd67Z1Do_iMOrA@mail.gmail.com>
Wow, you would think the bottom of the intake ports are possibly notched 
(indented) to clear the lifters on that low rise (if "rise" is even 
applicable) of a manifold. I find it interesting that certain manifolds such 
as the low rise D1JE-9425-AA on my Tiger have a marine designation.  You 
would think that a high rise manifold would be more applicable power wise 
and hood (or in this case engine cover) clearance would be a none issue on a 


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "michael king" <michael.s.king@gmail.com>
To: "H. B. Elam" <harryb@elams.org>
Cc: <tigers@autox.team.net>
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 6:24 PM
Subject: Re: [Tigers] 4bbl Manifold

> Harry,
> this is on ebay now:
> http://www.ebay.com/itm/Vintage-Small-Block-Ford-Low-Profile-Aluminum-4-bbl-Intake-Holley-1965-S-B-F-/200926731768?pt=Motors_Car_Truck_Parts_Accessories&hash=item2ec82a9df8&vxp=mtr
> no connection to seller.


Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/mharc@autox.team.net

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>