triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: triumph baack

To: Phil Ethier <pethier@isd.net>
Subject: Re: triumph baack
From: Joe Curry <spitlist@gte.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 17:04:34 +0000
Cc: Herald948@aol.com, 105671.471@compuserve.com, triumphs@autox.team.net, naffy@netins.net
References: <00a901c07db7$ec1721c0$168ceed0@PhilEthier>
Phil,
That quote was not mine!!!

Joe

Phil Ethier wrote:
> 
> From: Joe Curry <spitlist@gte.net>
> 
> >Some of that might have to do with the fact that the TR7 wasn't designed to
> >be a convertible. Surprising considering the country of origin, but not
> >surprising at a time when it was believed proposed US rollover standards
> >would effectively ban convertibles.
> 
> I never did understand that.  The factory could sidestep such standards
> easily with a factory roll bar.
> 
> Roadster buyers would gladly accept such a move, as the car looks racier.
> Jeep didn't have any probloems selling their vehicles because of the roll
> bars.
> 
> Phil Ethier    Saint Paul  Minnesota  USA
> 1970 Lotus Europa, 1992 Saturn SL2, 1986 Suburban, 1962 Triumph TR4 CT2846L
> LOON, MAC   pethier@isd.net     http://www.mnautox.com/
> "It makes a nice noise when it goes faster"
> - 4-year-old Adam, upon seeing a bitmap of Grandma Susie's TR4.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>