autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Conquest to GS

To: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>, <BRUBEL51@aol.com>, <Smokerbros@aol.com>,
Subject: Re: Conquest to GS
From: "John Mahoney" <jmahoney@cyberstation.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 1999 10:01:59 -0600
I really enjoy watching the older cars compete myself.  The best race I
remember working corners there was a complete group of classic cars running
a regional event in La Junta CO.  about 16 years ago.  There was a small
block Cobra, 67 Corvette big block coupe, Yenko corvair, Yenko Camaro, an
older Ferrai, and a real old A sports racer.  It was a hoot and it wasn't a
vintage race.  So lets instigate three more classes for the people who enjoy
the classics.  I have no interest myself I sold my GT-6.  Classic "A",
V-8's, 25 years and older, and Classics "B" 6 cyl, 25 years and older, and
Classic "C", 4 cyl, 25 years and older.  I know I want no more classes
myself but autocross events are the safest auto competition sport there is
and maybe just maybe some of the real classics would come out of hiding to
compete.  Better than just rusting away in some rich investors garage.  Yes
this may not be the exact story of this thread but it is my two cents of a
positive idea, I hope I didn't bore anyone.
John
98 acr daily driver and weekend toy
72 GT-6 CSP previously
-----Original Message-----
From: Kent Rafferty <gs96@sgi.net>
To: BRUBEL51@aol.com <BRUBEL51@aol.com>; Smokerbros@aol.com
<Smokerbros@aol.com>; autox@autox.team.net <autox@autox.team.net>
Date: Wednesday, November 10, 1999 4:55 PM
Subject: Re: Conquest to GS


Unfortunately, that philosophy will increase the generic nature of
autocrossing.  Neons in D, Miatas in B, Celicas in E, etc.  Why not
take a little time annually and move the cars that most people can
agree could benefit from the move without becoming class killers,
e.g. SVOs, Conquests, Supra Turbos (ooops, where'd THAT come
from?), Alfas, RX-7s.......

Some of the best cars may be old (ahem, vintage) and/or rare, why
bury them when they might have a chance at the local or regional
level in a slower (more appropriate) class?

All IMO,

Kent Rafferty
'93 Supra TT

> Why support a long out of production and now fairly rare car?  If you do
> that, you also need to find a better place for RX-7s, Alfa Romeos, etc.
Will
> those cars ever be popular enough to warrant the work?  Not really...
>
> Charlie Davis
> (Used to be the SCAC Chair.
> Got tired of Stock Classes.
> Now I'm going Prepared)
>
>
>
>  >>
> Hi: The point is that since the Conquest was obviousely layed to rest
because
> it was an overachiever in GS and now the DSM and the Type R is dominating
> why not just even the scales and place the proper car in the proper
class...
> If you can place anycar in any class then there is no need to have a class
> structure.. I am not asking that this specific car be reclassed what i am
> saying is that cars be classed properly as to where they belong.  that the
> SCAC does not classify cars for individuals or sponsorship to create a
> winner.  If we are to have faith in the classification structure of the
SCCA
> then cars of like ability should be competing against cars of like ability
.
> Bruce Bellom




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>