on 7/6/00 6:06 AM, Jeff Cashmore at firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
>> I think that if the classing goes through there are gonna be alot of neons
>> going up for sale. Looking over last year's results the only neon that
>> posted a faster time than the type R was Mr Mark Daddio. The rest of us
>> mortal neon drivers would get creamed.
> So it's ok to get creamed by Mark Daddio in a Neon but not Bob Endicott in a
> Type R? What's the difference?
>> Also keep in mind that there is still more speed to be had out of that ITR
>> while the neon has had all of it's development. Maybe I'm wrong but there
>> are alot of neon drivers out there who are not going to be served by this
> And if the new Neon is faster than the old you're not going to be served by
> Chrysler either. I'm getting the idea that the SCCA likes to shake things up
> every 5 yrs or so. The Rx7tt had it's day in the sun and so has the 95-99
> Neon. I like them both because they're relatively cheap and they'll still be
> Jeff Cashmore
Actually, after a little info from Mark D. last year, I even posted a faster
time in the challenge than all the Type R's at the Pro Finale. I believe the
Neon, personally, would be competitively classed with the Type R. Some
courses, I think the Neon would get creamed, read wipe-open hp courses. But
otherwise, the Neon would keep up. Just my own personal observation here. I
haven't seen the new classings yet, but where did they put the 2001 ACR?