So can somebody please explain in great detail why these holes are such a
performance advantage? Is it the 2 oz. of weight savings? The structural
weakening of the car? I'm sick of hearing about all these protests over
microscopic technicalities. Hasn't anyone heard of sportsmanship these
days?
Otto
>From: Scott Meyers <solo2@uswest.net>
>Reply-To: Scott Meyers <solo2@uswest.net>
>To: Mark Sirota <msirota@isc.upenn.edu>
>CC: Smokerbros@aol.com, autox@autox.team.net
>Subject: Re: Rear Shock Access for Lotii
>Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 17:39:19 -0700
>
>Mark Sirota wrote:
>
> > Smokerbros@aol.com wrote:
> >
> > > Can you spell "inconsistent?"
> >
> > No, it's not. It's not the same thing at all. The ASP issue was that
> > the shocks poked the hole itself, due to being placed close to the
> > fiberglass, and lots of Lotus flex. It's standard wear and tear, much
> > unlike the holes drilled in interior panels.
>
>So, if MH had drilled some holes for access *before* the shocks poked the
>holes it would be OK?
>
>Say, I think I saw him do just that :-)
>
>Scott Meyers
>
>
________________________________________________________________________
|