autox
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Short overlaps (was Rocky's Stats for 2000?)

To: kkelly@spss.com, jemitchell@compuserve.com, tholt@ccsi.com,
Subject: RE: Short overlaps (was Rocky's Stats for 2000?)
From: "Joe Goeke" <jcgz3@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 01:14:39 GMT
What part of my reply "15 second interval sucks" did you not understand the 
first time? ;-)
---JCG


>From: "Kelly, Katie" <kkelly@spss.com>
>To: "'Joe Goeke'" <jcgz3@hotmail.com>, jemitchell@compuserve.com,        
>tholt@ccsi.com, lollipop@ricochet.net
>CC: autox@autox.team.net
>Subject: RE: Short overlaps (was Rocky's Stats for 2000?)
>Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 16:29:00 -0700
>
>Joe Goeke writes...
>
> >I don't see any real changes needed to support 1200 >entrants, based on 
>how
>
> >proactive all the organizers were in keeping the
> >event running.
>
>Agreed, but fifteen second overlaps is:
>
>A) Dangerous
>B) Can slow down the event even more with reruns
>C) Further necessitates the need for audits, because NO ONE can keep up 
>with
>that pace, not even the Ironman athletes and computer geeks of SFR.
>
>Fifteen second overlaps = overkill. Hopefully, that won't happen again. Or
>if it does, sign me up to work course because I like extreme sports.
>
>Katie K.

_________________________________________________________________________



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>