| To: | mattm@optonline.net, evolution-discussions@yahoogroups.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [evolution-disc.] MR-2 why always 1993? |
| From: | MWood24020@aol.com |
| Date: | Mon, 30 Jan 2006 13:32:37 EST |
doesn't the '93 year allow the best mix and match of parts/options combination? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [evolution-disc.] MR-2 why always 1993?, Matt Murray |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [evolution-disc.] MR-2 why always 1993?, Matt Murray |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [evolution-disc.] MR-2 why always 1993?, Matt Murray |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [evolution-disc.] MR-2 why always 1993?, Matt Murray |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |