autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [evolution-disc.] Statement from the Ft. Myers National

To: "Team.Net" <autox@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: [evolution-disc.] Statement from the Ft. Myers National
From: Kevin Stevens <autox@pursued-with.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 22:52:42 -0800
Steve -

That clarification is of interest to me, too - I had always  
interpreted "unprepared" as "not Prepared"; that is, not of the  
"Prepared" modification classification.  It wouldn't have occurred to  
me to include "Street Prepared" in that definition.  I'm sure this  
whole chunk of the rules will be scrutinized as part of this  
incident, and maybe that language will get a rewrite.

Thanks!

KeS

On Feb 20, 2006, at 19:41, Sam & Greg Scharnberg wrote:

> Steve:
>
> Thanks again for the response.
>
> It's interesting because I have never read "unprepared" as meaning
> Stock.  Learn something new every day.  Sure wish they would have said
> something like "stock class vehicles". :-)
>
> Take care.
>
> Greg
>
> At 10:09 PM 2/20/2006 -0500, Steve Hoelscher wrote:
>> Greg, I will be glad to answer questions.  As noted, I will not  
>> engage in
>> debate.
>>
>> Greg Scharnberg wrote:
>>> How many Unprepared cars were entered in the event?  You usually  
>>> don't
>>> see very many newbies at Tours.
>>
>> "Unprepared" refers to car classing.  As in street prepared or  
>> prepared
>> catagory vs. stock category.   In this instance a car running in a  
>> stock
>> category class is an "unprepared" car.
>>
>> snip------------
>>
>> Steve Hoelscher
>> #27 DP
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> <*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
>     http://groups.yahoo.com/group/evolution-discussions/
>
> <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>     evolution-discussions-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
>     http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>