| To: | az589@lafn.org |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: A cam vs. B cam and More! |
| From: | Daniel Neuman <dneuman@quark.sfsu.edu> |
| Date: | Mon, 5 Feb 2001 15:04:29 -0800 (PST) |
Hi Stan,
It sounds like that C cam would be even less streetable than the
B cam.
Daniel 69 2000
SF CA
> Why stop with the "B" cam instead of the cam from Nissan called "Solex II"
> and sometimes referred to as the "C" cam. This cam had more lift and
> duration than the "B" cam and had the same base circle diameter so the
> rocker geometry was correct. The marking on the Solex II cam was marked
> "25510" and was supplied through the Datsun Comp department. These were
> not regrinds.
>
> Stan
> SRL311-00037
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Engine for custom, Daniel Neuman |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: for sale: '66 1600 - San Francisco, Nathan Ruffcorn |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: A cam vs. B cam and More!, sidney raper |
| Next by Thread: | Ebay Roadster/Brandon Lee?, Nathan Ruffcorn |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |