Hi All.
Mr Iizuka's starting point for the design was the tail light concept.
The rest in cluding the rear panel followed. BTW the panel isn't quite
flat, it has a gentle curvefrom side to side.
Phill Brook
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gordon Glasgow" <gsglasgow@attbi.com>
Date: Monday, December 17, 2001 12:38 pm
Subject: RE: Roadster styling (was originality thread)
> If you look at Hidehiro IIzuka's early stying sketches as
> reproduced in Phill
> Brook's (excellent) book, it appears that the tailights and
> relatively flat rear
> panel were part of the design from the very beginning. I think the
> taillightshave a rather jet-exhaust look, which was quite common
> in that era.
>
> Of course, the panel isn't completely flat but rather has some
> interestingcontours, which I'm sure has caused no end of grief to
> less-than-knowledgeable
> body men.
>
> By 1969 Triumph had picked up the flat rear panel idea in the
> Michelotti/Karmanndesigned TR6, which I always thought looked
> great. In fact, at one time I
> painted the rear panel on my roadster flat black like the Triumph
> (partly to
> hide corrosion).
>
> Gordon Glasgow
> Renton, WA
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net
> > [mailto:owner-datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net]On Behalf Of snyler
> > Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2001 5:08 PM
> > To: Mark Sedlack; roadster List
> > Subject: Roadster styling (was originality thread)
> >
> >
> > Mark Sedlack wrote
> >
> > >However, I personally have never liked the "flat" rear-end
> panel on the
> > >Roadster, and have always suspected it was due primarily to
> ease of
> > >manufacture, rather than a planned styling detail.
> > I've wondered about the back recently myself. Perhaps it's a
> cost thing,
> > perhaps the roadster was ahead of its time, anticipating the
> Kamm-back
> > styling of the late 60s. I used to think the taillights were stuck
> > on...items pulled from the Nissan parts bin, but they're unique
> to the
> > roadster. If they'd used Bluebird (311) taillights of the era
> (which> look like they might fit) there'd be much more of an MGB
> resemblance. I
> > know the Roadster had its debut a year earlier, but it's hard
> enough to
> > convince folks of the order of appearance as it is.
> > -Marc T.
> >
> >
>
========================================================================
==> Marc Tyler TDROC Sisterdale TX
> > 1970 1600 #SPL311-31016
> > 1965 L-320 #L320 013642
> > http://datsun_marc.tripod.com/cgi-bin/datsun_homepage.html
> >
> > /// datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net mailing list
> > /// Send admin requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or go to
> > /// http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
> > /// Send list postings to datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net
>
> /// datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net mailing list
> /// Send admin requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or go to
> /// http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
> /// Send list postings to datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net
/// datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net mailing list
|