datsun-roadsters
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: SU carbs 1600 v/s 2000

To: "Dixon, Clifton, SSG, 134ARW, CP" <Clifton.Dixon@tnknox.ang.af.mil>,
Subject: Re: SU carbs 1600 v/s 2000
From: "datsunmike" <datsunmike@nyc.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 19:51:01 -0500
Don't use the 1600 carbs as they don't flow nearly enough for the 2000. The
1600s barely flow enogh for modified 1600s. The linkage will also present
problems.

Mike

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dixon, Clifton, SSG, 134ARW, CP" <Clifton.Dixon@tnknox.ang.af.mil>
To: <datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net>
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 1:58 PM
Subject: SU carbs 1600 v/s 2000


> Greetings all,
>         I have a 1970 2000 and two sets of SU carbs: one set from a '68
1600
> and the original set from my '70 2000.  They look almost identical except
> the '70s are dome-shaped, and the '68s are flatter on top.  The '70s may
be
> a little larger, although I haven't compared them closely enough to say
for
> sure.
>       What's the difference, if any?  What are the pros and cons of using
> either?
>
>           Thanks!  Dave Dixon  Knoxville, TN
>
> ///  datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net mailing list
> ///  Send admin requests to majordomo@autox.team.net  or go to
> ///  http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
> ///  Send list postings to datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net

///  datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net mailing list


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>