datsun-roadsters
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [Roadsters] Model considerations [was: Twisties was: why 67.5

from [Bill Cole] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: John F Sandhoff <sandhoff@csus.edu>
Subject: Re: [Roadsters] Model considerations [was: Twisties was: why 67.5
From: Bill Cole <datrock@centurytel.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 11:33:17 -0800 
Just want to thank those who replied about the dealers stamping the year 
on the plate, I'm still learning. I agree the car should have sold as 
1966, I guess this explains the 65 1600's too. thanks   Bill
________________________________________


Datsun-roadsters mailing list

http://www.team.net/archive

http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/datsun-roadsters
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [Roadsters] U20 - Rough low idle - Chain slop, John F Sandhoff
Next by Date:  [Roadsters] 66 Vs 67 what about chassis numbers Vs other ID points, Jim InVirginia
Previous by Thread:  Re: [Roadsters] Model considerations [was: Twisties was: why 67.5, John F Sandhoff
Next by Thread:  [Roadsters] 66 Vs 67 what about chassis numbers Vs other ID points, Jim InVirginia
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]