datsun-roadsters
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Roadsters] 1600 v 2000? OR BOTH MAYBE??

To: "Gregory S. Morrison" <gsm@gregorysmorrison.com>,
Subject: Re: [Roadsters] 1600 v 2000? OR BOTH MAYBE??
From: Tim <tputland@charter.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 15:24:26 -0700
Wellllllllllll......I have both so there you go. I would love to have a short 
windshield with either engine, but that is not an option as I am too tall to 
drive them. But I must say, my 1600 is getting a five speed tranny eventually. 
It just begs for one more gear, even more so since I started running a GB 
dizzy. And one of the two runners might end up with a flat dash as I love that 
look as well.

PEACE :-)

Tim
Belleville, WI.
'70 SPL AND SRL
Still clueless but always learning

---- "Gregory S. Morrison" <gsm@gregorysmorrison.com> wrote: 

=============
I've seen several ground up restorations of 1600s and 2000s. All things
being equal, the cost is very similar. So, other than "because it's been in
my family for years", or "because I like 1600s better than 2000s", why are
some people pouring a ton of money into restoring a stock 1600? Why not go
with a 2000? Same car, but with more gears and more power.

Just curious.

Greg
SRL31100494
________________________________________
________________________________________
Support Team.Net  http://www.team.net/donate.html


Datsun-roadsters mailing list

http://www.team.net/archive

http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/datsun-roadsters

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>