fot
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: BJ's

To: "Susan and Jack Brooks" <tr3a@att.net>, <fot@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: BJ's
From: "edwardbarnard" <edwardbarnard@prodigy.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 20:18:12 -0600
Jack:
    Yes, you are correct. This is a nice, fast, dirty caster adjustment that
I've shared with a few people in the past. They are reasonably priced, and
the holes line up perfect! Thanks - Ed

----- Original Message -----
From: "Susan and Jack Brooks" <tr3a@att.net>
To: <fot@autox.team.net>
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 5:21 PM
Subject: RE: BJ's


> Nick,
>
> I believe what you are looking for is the Jaguar Series II upper ball
joint.
>
> The setup I am aware of is for providing adjustable caster to a TR3.  This
> involved the use of TR4 upper arms (so it'll work for a TR4 also) and a
Jaguar
> Series II upper ball joint.  The joint is narrower than the TR ball and
needed
> to be shimmed front or back to move the pivot point accordingly.
>
> I don't recall where I became aware of this combination of parts, but
since I
> have not yet executed it myself, so you may be well advised to wait for a
> confirmation from the list, before buying the ball joints.  Sorry I
couldn't be
> more definitive, but until I do it myself, it's hear-say.
>
> Can anyone confirm the Jaguar Series II upper ball joint is what Nick is
looking
> for?
>
> Later,
>
> Jack Brooks
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: owner-fot@autox.team.net [mailto:owner-fot@autox.team.net]On
> >Behalf Of Malaboge@aol.com
> >Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 9:47 AM
> >To: fot@autox.team.net
> >Subject: BJ's
> >
> >
> >Fellow Modifiers-
> >
> >A while back someone mentioned some thinner upper ball joints from (I
> >think) a Jag of some sort that would fit the big TR cars. Now that I
> >have carved up a set of trunions to give more castor, I need these
> >thinner joints in order to move the upright!
> >
> >Never one to let it rest...
> >      Nick in Nor Cal
> >
> >Why is it that if the label says take two tablets, its always shake
> >none, shake one, shake one, shake three...BUT if its take one its
> >always shake none, shake none, shake two!

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>