What I would consider the main parts of the wiki - the forums, the faqs, the
articles, the image galleries are for all intents and purposes empty. The wiki
has been there for two years and the 11.8 thousand list subscribers aren't
using it.
You suggested a wiki would be the correct approach - I suggested an existing
wiki that could be played with - but I'm wrong. Wrong to make a suggestion.
Here, let me add a <G>!. There, that makes it all better now, doesn't it?
But, I know the fix - unsubscribe healeys.
Bye!
Ed wrote:
> Bob:
>
> Whilst basically "correct"; you aren't<G>!
>
> What Allen, etal are proposing would be an ESTABLISHED data base to start
> with of just Big Healey info.
>
> As I am surmizing Allen post, the team.net gazillion post would NOT be part
> of what he is offering.
>
> Mark has close to 12 THOUSAND contributors to all of his Lists.
>
> Now I am NOT gonna, just for grins, do a search for Dot 5 !!
>
> or "electronic ignition". Or L*rd forbid, "restoration"!!!!
>
> Any one of them would prob'ly smoke Mark's system!!! And then YOU would
> have to wade thru all.
>
> Whereas, with what Allen is saying there would be WAY less files and almost
> all would be Big Healey.
>
> Oh tay??
>
> <G>
>
> Ed
|